Expensive Engagement Rings Are Less Expensive Engagement Rings Just As Good As The More Expensive Ones. I Found One I Like But Unsure?

Are less expensive engagement rings just as good as the more expensive ones. I found one i like but unsure? - expensive engagement rings

when I looked I found a number of rings for $ 500, but apparently it is very easy and the band was narrower in comparison to more expensive sets at $ 3000, if not my girlfriend too much money is devoted to, but I want something that looks beautiful. We've both been married before

7 comments:

indydst8 said...

The cost of the ring is not as important as quality. What is being described - and slightly less closely - could lend itself to be easily damaged in the future. You want the ring, at least until the last marriage, and it would certainly improve the quality. They do not support the inclusion of three miles, but still a robust set of rings.

fizzy stuff said...

The $ 500. That's a great track. Why should we take that risk? U.S. $ 3,000 is not too extravagant. Get pass the ring, the test of time.

carebear... said...

I went with a thicker band, but not too thick, because I have small fingers .... anyway, my friend gave me his great-grandmother ring and needed a new group. His group was so exhausted is sooo thin. She is 97 years! I chose the band to know a little thicker .... So good I would almost think it's a very narrow band. But in reality, no matter when it comes to money when you travel to find a ring or a series of 500 and love, so why not? We spend 354 in my band in 14 carat white gold, and I love it! So if something you and how is something that you think your partner's love, then go!

melouofs said...

There is a reason why some rings cost more than others, and in general the quality of the materials used. Both can contain diamonds, but you can get tons of errors, while the other may be a jewel of much better quality.

melouofs said...

There is a reason why some rings cost more than others, and in general the quality of the materials used. Both can contain diamonds, but you can get tons of errors, while the other may be a jewel of much better quality.

heller said...

This is not that what man has his ring, but usually more expensive, the quality is not better

wildchil... said...

Probably depends on the quality of the diamond, and if the diamond is a land mine that uses the slaves (in the diamond industry, representing more than 90%)

For a ring (I'm against the whole Engagement rings, but to each his own i guess), then you save some money and a ring of decent quality. $ 500 for a ring is like a slap in the face and bad manners.

Post a Comment