What is so bad about Wikipedia, that teachers should prohibit students from using it for projects or reports? - wikipedia
I help my nephew with his grade 5 science project. The worksheet has the "Wikipedia" boldly printed on the bottom of the page.
I told a staff member and learned that his girlfriend (7. grade at another school) have the same problem.
I understand that a small percentage of the information on the wiki are posted can be wrong, but you would with other sources to avoid the errors in a primary school project.
Wikipedia What Is So Bad About Wikipedia, That Teachers Should Prohibit Students From Using It For Projects Or Reports?
6 comments:
It should serve as a starting point for research, but not used, because the real source. Since the content has not changed or reviewed by a school approved. The content may change at any time and can be easily placed misinformation. The views of people in the articles to come, must describe the facts.
Wikipedia is an easy solution, but it will not replace the library and find books and articles. It is a skill score 5 p.m. to 7 p.m. must be developed.
The problem is that while Wikipedia is very informative, shows the data recorded or written where no path. Anyone can edit the section on the topic. Everything you need to do is to publish their own information, even if a warning or a note indicating that if they could change that people invent things too easily.
What we can do is to use Wikipedia as a starting point to the facts of the investigation. Once you excellent information can be found on another page or a Wikipedia reference book and see if is indeed a fact. Then you can list on paper.
Good luck!
Well, the truth is that before you go into a library, a subject of research, you can now with the internet and offering "information" on this particular issue. The problem Reliz, which brings information into the system. Now, Wikipedia, (and I mean nobody, no one!) You can place information about a topic. It's really hard to follow what is real and what is a lie) (or fiction.
The obvious problem arises when a child learns to look, for example, on vampires (at Wikipedia, and you know what I believe mine), that just because that is "about the site Wikipedia a great thing, dont get me wrong but it has a lot of fiction that can not be proved or a reliable source.
Another problem is that Wikipedia is very easy to copy for a student in the past, rather than truly studied or read at all.
If you are a teacher with 20 students and give them a piece of writing, I would say you get 19 identical items were simply copy / paste from Wikipedia. The child 20 is the one who sent your question on Yahoo Answers, and copying and pasting what someone has written a response.
The teachers want their students to use other resources for research in their role as EBSCOhost, newspaper articles or other online and library books owned, online articles and organizational matters. So they can learn more things and write what they are connected to your topic sentence.
However, Wikipedia is not bad, and also depend on other resources was also written in the article. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia of the short form, which is free and accessible to all. Unlike the British encyclopedia, you need to pay a subscription.
Teachers will be for all students at all levels not to trust Wikipedia, and you should be on research techniques, reading and learning to learn things more than the average student. There's also the excitement of a research topic with facts and history that are not in the articles of Wikipedia are available.
It is true that confirmation can help, but there remains the question of the reliability of the Internet in general. I am thinking of getting the ban on Wikipedia, perhaps in an attempt to students to further research, it is very easy to use Wikipedia to find things very quickly. Perhaps the idea is to stop students rely too much on one site, or if the necessary research practices from many sources.
Moreover, while most of the information on Wikipedia is true, is all that and used by others, and in May made available and not always academic merit. This does not mean that all elements could not do that the support of the school, but not quote my response as a source, although the skills I have!
We hope that this answer gives you some pointers. I may be wrong, but the Internet after all!
Post a Comment